Dnd homebrew reddit4/19/2023 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Not balanced, and will probably break your game. You can play as a ghost that does ghost stuff. It is not for everyone, but is one of those classes you can give to that player than wants crunch to keep them happy for literally years. If your players are disappointed by the official Artificer, give it a try. Can be difficult to approach, but balance is what Kibbles does. * I am told this has been updated and I might be behind a version or two.Īn alternate take on Artificer with some more depth.īalanced. I find it overtuned, but your mileage may vary. Last time I posted those, plenty of people were willing to defend it, so take my opinion with a grain of salt. It's very hard to balance having an extra dragon worth of hp running around. Like if a ranger had a pet dragon and didn't suck. I don’t necessarily think it should be a class or that it’s the best designed thing, but since the rework it’s perfectly playableĪ knight + a dragon. If it makes a critter in your group happy, letting them play it won’t really break anything. If you have the hot take of “5e doesn’t have tactical combat”, you run a very different game than me, and can safely ignore my review and balance notes.īalanced. I play a game that is fairly tactical combat heavy. Let me reiterate: this is my review, and my thoughts on balance based on my game. In general, I’m not including duplicates of the same idea, just the one I liked the best.You are busy people, and the point of this is to reduce the list of things to sort through. It has to have been able to get into my playtest with two criteria: it was interesting enough for a player to look at it and ask me if they could play it, and it wasn’t crazy enough for me to reject it just reading through it. Expect 8-to-100’s of hours of playtesting ending in my opinion. That’s not comprehensive, but it does mean at least 8+ hours of playing that class, and usually quite a lot more. I define this as having a player that has played it in 2-3 playtest sessions or one shots, or at least past level 5 of it in a campaign. So here’s the rules for inclusion this time: I don’t like to review paid content, as I don’t really think anyone should buy something because I said it was good, but if I don’t include them, people are going to just ask me what I think of them anyway. This time I will include some classes that aren’t free, but in a separate section. In the last one, I did only free classes. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |